International Consensus Statement on Rhinosinusitis

Zhelnov P. A critical appraisal of ‘Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Smith TL, Bleier B, DeConde A, Luong A, Poetker DM, Soler Z, Welch KC, Wise SK, Adappa N, Alt JA, Anselmo-Lima WT, Bachert C, Baroody FM, Batra PS, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Beswick D, Bhattacharyya N, Chandra RK, Chang E, Chiu A, Chowdhury N, Citardi MJ, Cohen NA, Conley DB, DelGaudio J, Desrosiers M, Douglas R, Eloy JA, Fokkens WJ, Gray ST, Gudis DA, Hamilos DL, Han JK, Harvey R, Hellings P, Holbrook EH, Hopkins C, Hwang P, Javer AR, Jiang RS, Kennedy D, Kern R, Laidlaw T, Lal D, Lane A, Lee HM, Lee JT, Levy JM, Lin SY, Lund V, McMains KC, Metson R, Mullol J, Naclerio R, Oakley G, Otori N, Palmer JN, Parikh SR, Passali D, Patel Z, Peters A, Philpott C, Psaltis AJ, Ramakrishnan VR, Ramanathan M Jr, Roh HJ, Rudmik L, Sacks R, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Sindwani R, Smith K, Snidvongs K, Stewart M, Suh J, Tan BK, Turner JH, van Drunen CM, Voegels R, Wang Y, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Wright ED, Yan C, Zhang L, Zhou B. International Consensus Statement on Rhinology and Allergy: Rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Nov 24. doi: 10.1002/alr.22741. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33236525’. Zheln. 2020 Nov 28;48(2):r67d25. URI: https://zheln.com/record/2020/11/25/67/.

Zheln Review Appraisal in 10 Steps:

1. ✅ Downloaded from the PubMed Systematic Subset Daily Updates
2. ✅ Meets Shojania & Bero 2001 True Positive Criteria for Systematic Reviews by Abstract
3. ✅ Full Text Collected by Zheln
4. ✅ Generates Pragmatic Evidence Directly Relevant to Evidence-Based Practice
5. ✅ Not Found Duplicate by Zheln
6. ❌ Failed Replication
7. 🔄 Has Critical Conduct Flaws?
8. 🔄 Liked or Disliked by Zheln?
9. 🔄 Practical Implications Summarized by Zheln
10. 🔄 Appraisal Published & Call for Crowdfunding

Systematic reviews conducted are not reported clearly in this document. Only the summarized results are reported, so this is not replicable.

I have already started appraisal of this article and have not been able to replicate it. Replicability (reproducibility) is a must-have for a great systematic review, but sometimes it is compromised mostly by bad reporting. Therefore, assessing this review comprehensively will require me to make every effort to collect all available study records, including contacting the authors, and will take considerable time. I will complete the appraisal as soon as I’m able to. Please return sometime later or follow the progress of this page here or on GitHub as I do the appraisal. Also, you can look for similar systematic review appraisals using search or by tapping on AMA specialty tags at the bottom of this page or in the side menu.

If you really need me to appraise this review ASAP, please consider buying a $1 to $600 Zheln subscription on Patreon, GitHub Sponsors, or Open Collective. Afterwards, you’ll be able to immediately PM me with the review request. Otherwise, you might as well send me a donation via PayPal with this reference in the message, and I’ll happily appraise it for you.

By all means, you are always welcome reaching out to me for whatever reason by email or on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or Telegram. I’m happy to get your feedback!