Literacy in Omics Sciences

Zhelnov P. A critical appraisal of ‘Calabrò GE, Sassano M, Tognetto A, Boccia S. Citizens’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review. Front Genet. 2020 Oct 23;11:570649. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649. PMID: 33193671; PMCID: PMC7644959’. Zheln. 2020 Nov 18;47(1):r170d16. URI: https://zheln.com/record/2020/11/16/170/.

Zheln Review Appraisal in 10 Steps:

1. ✅ Downloaded from the PubMed Systematic Subset Daily Updates
2. ✅ Meets Shojania & Bero 2001 True Positive Criteria for Systematic Reviews by Title
3. ✅ Full Text Collected by Zheln
4. 🔄 Generates Pragmatic Evidence Directly Relevant to Evidence-Based Practice?
5. 🔄 Is Duplicate?
6. 🔄 Passed or Failed Replication?
7. 🔄 Has Critical Conduct Flaws?
8. 🔄 Liked or Disliked by Zheln?
9. 🔄 Practical Implications Summarized by Zheln
10. 🔄 Appraisal Published & Call for Crowdfunding

I have already started appraisal of this article and will complete it as soon as I’m able to. Please return sometime later or follow the progress of this page here or on GitHub as I do the appraisal. Also, you can look for similar systematic review appraisals using search or by tapping on AMA specialty tags at the bottom of this page or in the side menu.

This project is independent research and is supported by crowdfunding only, so please consider making a minimal donation as low as $1 either on Patreon, GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, or via PayPal.

By all means, you are always welcome reaching out to me for whatever reason by email or on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or Telegram. I’m happy to get your feedback!